firekorn

http://customsforge.com/index.php/topic/50009-leader-boards-on-customs-not-populating-bass/?hl=score+attack

You don't need that box, just select a note by clicking on it and use the mouse wheel to adjust the sustain (or you can use the keyboard key [ or ] too). The note panel, as i said, is useless for adjusting sustain. I don't know how else i can write this anymore really.

Already told you how to adjust the sustain on a selected note

The note panel offer no control over the sustain. the issue you have in the main view is that you are too zoomed out to actually notice the sustain on the note but it's there. But what bother me the most in that screenshot is the fact you are not syncing the beat to the music which will only make your work harder on so many aspect and won't allow you to create quality content at any point.

@@tacticalcity mouse wheel or [ and ] (and this is all in the help of EOF that you can access by pressing F1)

@@shadowfeaux Cherub Rock, the first line in the first post literally.

@@MetalDevil you should not move the note one by one but instead adjust the beatmap in EOF to fit with the tempo of the song. I cover this partially in my tutorial which can be accessed by clicking "Create CDLC" at the top and i put link toward a few more complete tutorial on the subject. Note that even if you have a tab, you can always play around and do modification to it in Guitar Pro if you desire which can help to get acquainted with the interface and logic of it all more easily than trying to copy something without many knowledge on some of the notation which can end up being more guess work than anything.

@@MetalDevil You realize you can download the gp5 tab from songsterr for free though right? :)

You can't.

@@Stowy This is for PC though not MAC. @@minimaestro17 and @@tisverycool You are the only two use i've seen that have issue with CDLC on MAC at the moment with the current patcher while i'm fairly certain it works for at least one user. I will need a lot more information regarding your specific situation but i don't see any reason to imagine that CDLC on MAC are dead at the moment considering many of the MAC user i'm aware of have not manifested themself on the subject at all.

@@bassplr19 Yes and it's not likely to change for CDLC though it's not related to the original OP back from 2018.

The biggest concern with such system is that it's huge and requires a decent amount of space to place in a room which is why it's not something you commonly see in a house but if you are confident you have space for it, i don't see any glaring issue with such a system.

I have no issue on my end.

If you want some indsight. RS scores are linked to a specific arrangement ID, if that ID changed for whatever reason, RS won't link the scores back as it's a different arrangement for him. That arrangement is something that can change when altering a CDLC file which is the most plausible explanation of your situation.

@@tacticalcity any chance you've altered the CDLC file by any means (CFSM repair function for example?)

The more the easier in that kind of situation but all that is really needed to test that kind of thing is the .eof and the guitar.ogg, the rest is either not needed to build a psarc or can be generated from the EOF file anyway.

Is it possible to have the file you used? That would make it easier to diagnose or even see if we can reproduce the issue on our side.

Is the dd file actually not generated at all? Would be nice to have access to the file you use too to try out on our side and be able to dissect the file.

@@minimaestro17 It indicate that the directory don't exist though so it can't copy the file. Seems like you haven't installed RS in the default path that we expect most user to have used so you'll have to adjust RS path yourself for it to work.

@@minimaestro17 Are you sure you applied the patch properly?

CDLC not working - General Rocksmith - CustomsForge

https://source.android.com/devices/audio/latency/measurements A value under 25ms is largely suggested for an app such as RS and those test don't include RS own computational processing of the signal which will add to those values. You can see that it largely limits the amount of device that would be supported and this also doesn't take into account the use of a USB input which might not offer the same latency figure either. At this moment, Android and audio latency aren't quite best friend so far.

You can't define the strength of a vibrato. Both option seems viable but the tech note is largely more work (no need for the ignore status though) to get something that looks good compared to using only the vibrato status and letting the user figure out how far he needs to go.

@ Section is what you select in RR, phrase are for the levelling up or down of the dynamic difficulty and all official DLC use only one phrase per section.

Sound is sound, there's no good monitor for one specific thing, either they are techincally accurately or they aren't. It's like video monitor, if a video monitor have more red than it should, it'll never be considered good. Why would you consider it's good when it comes to something that is suppose to reproduce sound? Regarding the two monitor you shared, unless you can find actual test regarding their frequency response in axis and off axis, you might as well buy them totally blindly. Knowing how far they can reach within a 3dB margin doesn't mean that they don't have any kind of major dip somewhere in their frequency range or even bump (like color filter for a TV screen if you want). It's information that are severely lacking when it comes to studio monitor and the only two i know that have reliable and good result are the JBL 305/308 or the Line Pine from Kali Audio. Otherwise the next range of reliable monitor brand are the genelec or neumann but they tend to be way more expensive. Also the coaxial system is not something that solve the positioning, it's something that solve the technical challenge that is to create a coherent waveform in a given direction when both driver (tweeter and woofer) are not in the same axis but it doesn't magically make the whole thing better. The engineering behind coaxial system still requires work to get it right, something that can't be proven if there's no proper test done for those monitor.