ShrillBear52

Man i was about to start to listen to them and then this happens .... Why  :(   R.I.P Chris. You were the idols for some of my fav. bands.  :(

It's going to be a better year than the last year because I'm going to enjoy 3 of my favourite bands such as Green Day, Billy Talent and Breaking Benjamin. Kinda sad that Chevell's last tour didn't take place in my country.I'm still hopeing for it and so does for Godsmack.

These concerts are realy going to help with my anexity. 

@@ShrillBear52 I must have missed this when you posted it.  Is this problem still happening?  If so, can you post a fresh screen capture or project file demonstrating the issue?

Never you mind. I'm not using eof or any other cdlc creator program anymore (still a quiestion if I will ever do more cdlc )

If Motivation is a problem because of lack of fitting songs -

as said above - really give the Championship a try... not only check out the songs, but join in and fight for the weeks win and a few points in the leaderboard.

 

You get served only excellent quality cdlcs every week, and loads of them.

Like me there are a lot of players over there that did not miss one in over 100 weeks after joining!

 

Give it a shot, it´s good for you!

Thanks , I just have lot of shit going on again and I hope that I finish soon so I can get back to play again.

So? Them couldn't reupload for this reason? :(

There is a rule for that, if a CDLC becoms and official one, then they will remove the custom made from the website,also you can't upload songs that are official content on rocksmith.

Check out a band called Kaleo and their album A/B take things in a different direction and maybe try making some customs of their stuff :P

It would be great if i could return to making customs, but I will check them out thank! :D 

Or you could just come over to the dark side, and play bass. :D

That will be my friend's job  ;)

try some slayer or iron maiden they are fun to play until you get to the solos and then I just try to hit at least some notes. Also bring me the horizon is quite fun as long as its not from "that's the spirit"

Thanks! I know and playd a bit of Maiden and Slayer too, they're both great, it might time to play does bands, also I haven't heard any BMTH songs,I might check them out too.

Dude oh man.. I'm just here to shed some insight on song choices.. You seem to like alot of the same type of rock I do.. But Check out Parkway Drive.  They are a bunch of Australian surfer dudes that are badass metal players!  They're SICK!  They also have a full documentary out of them touring all over the world on youtube..  It's a badass watch.  Look into Tremonti - doesn't matter , As I lay Dying- Defender, start with those songs and pick and choose the others you see on Ignition.. Some other bands are  Woven War which was all the previous members of As I lay Dying, minus the head singer...   Another good one is Wage War, Polyphia, Intervals.  Let me know if you need anymore help.  Those bands alone will give you an ear gasm if you give htem a try

Wow! Thanks dude,I will definetly check them out !  ;)

Oh you're both right, I forgotten about the championship and yes, I once playd the songs from there and it was good.(That's how I started to like A Day To Remember) Thanks! I'm still open to any advice or new bands that I haven't playd before or heard before!

It's been a while since I made my last post in CF and it had many reasons.

First,I started to have doubts about creating content for the community, also had doubts that I can't make any progress about guitar playing and family issues of course.

  I don't know when did I posted my last CDLC on the website but it was at leas 3 or 4 months ago.

To get to the point I need your help guys!

I just can't seem to find anything new material to try out and play (what I mean by that, bands or just songs). Also,I've markd a bunch of youtube videos to watch it about guitar playing but for some reason I don't watch them and not because I'm not interestid, it's something more strange than that (my guess would be because of stress and preasure (I quite have a tough phase in my life)).

I simply don't have motivation for playing, I do play still but  not as motivated as I playd earlier.

 Maybe,I just got bored of what I playd (I'm not sure.)

I mostly play Billy Talent songs, but recently about 2 weeks ago, I started to play Bullet For My Valentine songs (only the Official DLC ones) and that's it,nothing new since then.

So what new habits should I do to make progress or bands to get insperation?

My mainly playd bands: Billy Talent, Breaking Benjamin,Chevelle,Godsmack(not so much as I once playd but still),Bullet For My Valentine (from now), Green Day(well not sure about this, it's been almost a half year since I playd any of their song, but I playd almost all of their available songs) Disturbed (only 3 or 4 of ther Official DLC songs)

and these are the current ones that are in my mind right now.

And I'm also trying to get back to making CDLCs because I don't have anything to motivate me currently.

I'm mostly open to any advice, and thank you guys!

Without CF and Rocksmith I would be nowhere in my guitar playing! <3 

Okay so with your latest project :

 

1) still a DD specific issue caused by a low phrase length parameter

 

2) I can still find at least one case where you have unnecessary FHP definition that might cause Handshape display issue (note that i can find on many occasion 2 FHP at the same fret value which have no reason to be)

 

3) Not sure if it's a FHP or a phrase length issue with DD, but as i said in "2)" i can also find occasion of 2 FHP of the same value that aren't separated by a section which can easily cause that kind of issue

 

4) That's only because you use a low phrase length parameter, i'm really not sure how else can i explain this

 

5) At this point i think it might be a FHP issue more than a section issue but both are likely to be conflicting making debugging a mess as long as you use DDC while trying to figure it out

1.)Ok,I think i get it now.Honestly,I didn't know what "phrase length" was and didn't noticed this feature in the ToolKit, sorry, I should have askd it before I post it.  

2.)I don't think that I added FHP to that specific point where you markd with the red x. But at some points I did it on purpose,because in my last song what I made I had an issue with it.Some of the chords had wide appearance.(what I mean by that, is the chords apperd more than 4 fret wide. example: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2dAm5utc-VcNDNieVhhMElqM2M)that's the reason why some of the chords have more FHPs then it should be (like at the second intro phrase in the Real_Bass part)

3.)I'm not sure about it either,I'll try with a higher pharse length and see if theres any change.

4.)So I should use 16 as pharse length setting? (what does this feature do anyway??...just asking)

5.)I already explaind it why I did it in "2.)" in anyway,I'll remove it and see if there is any difference.

Also,thank you for helping me with all of these I'm appreciate it! 

As i said, the DDC issue is likely related to the "phrase length" value you defined when using DDC. i can't help you more than that without all the files to actually try it myself on my own setup.

 

Just saying "it isn't" doesn't help, i think it is and i saw case of that issue inside the project you sent us, if you think it's something else, sure but you will need to prove it before simply rejecting our help....

 

If you have a project that is different to what you gave us, discussing and debugging will be incredibly complicated as we will see different things that doesn't correspond to what you actually use which might gives different result than what we can expect from the project we have.

 

We can help you but we'll need to take things step by step and if you keep refusing to take our opinion and trying to actually apply what we ask you to, this topic will go nowhere.

I'm not rejection or refusind anything, I'm just not realy understanding what you or someone else said and that's why I keep asking something.Like "how should I properly define phrases " or else. 

  The reason why you don't understanding what I'm saying is most likely  that I can't realy express my self more then 

    I alreary told.

But I try my best as I could, 

like, this is the current project   https://www.dropbox.com/s/s35voue2bpn1zbz/But%20I%27ll%20go%20on%20until%20the%20end.eof?dl=0  ( still the only difference is the FHP change at the bass arpeggio)

But please,If you have any issue understand me then just tell me,and I'll try to explain it in a clearer.

1) that's because there's a new section starting which break the handshape, if it's only happening with DD, i would suggest to use a higher phrase length parameter.

 

2) It's likely the same kind of issue than the bass part, a new FHP definition will break the handshape.

 

3) Likely a section issue again but with the project you shared there :http://customsforge.com/topic/34865-chord-length-issue-again/?do=findComment&comment=242167 it shouldn't happen

 

4) if you use DDC, this is likely due to a low phrase length parameter whan applying DDC. It has already been mentionned many times in that topic.

 

5) Could also be a DDC related issue (section thingy) as i doubt it would behave weirdly without it looking at the project.

 

The screenshot is the project you shared with us. If it isn't the right one, we can't help you properly... You likely deleted the FHP that i mark as "1" and the one marked as "2" in that screenshot but you should have only deleted the one marked "2" and you would have obtained the desired result.

 

At one point, you are getting overwhelmed with issue that you can't deal with them anymore. The project doesn't have the time signature defined properly, the first beat has a section which will also cause issue. I have 2 warning when saving the project you gave us too (one also being about a handshape crossing a section...).

 

I appreciate all the effort you deploy but i seriously think you should take it slow and try to understand all the details that you are messing with one by one instead of going all over the place.

1.)Hmm,it's quite stupid if a section is starting just at a specific chord and that chord has a long handshape/sustian it this issue appers. But what can or SHOULD do in this case other than not using DD? Also,it has been said,that If I use 3.2 DDC then this shouldn't be a problem and I did it but nothing realy changed...

2.) There isn't any new FHP at that point other than the begininng of the first chord.(Again,that is not that specific picture that I currently have,but I'll provid that one tomorrow)

3.)Yes,but It is a problem I only changed the bass arpeggio and resnaped all 5 aranngement since that project that I sent a link for it.

I could send a link for the chart to see it and not only the project (If it needs to )

4.)Then what should I do to get a normal DD for each part? Should I change setting when I add DD for the arrangements?

5.)Could be but it's not,I've check with and without DD the case is the same....

I don't know about the picture ........... There was only one FHP at that arpeggio and I was confused why in your pic. has to FHPs.

  What I did is I changed that first FHP from 3 to 1 and got that result at the bass arp..

What do you mean by not having the time signature defined properly? And what section are you referring in wich arrangement?

Also,I don't get any warning if I save the project other than "this note is specified  as using the index finger but the frethand position is on a different fret" (With the newest eof)

I'm getting realy tired by this point with all those issues , so you're right.

  I'm starting to think that maybe I should stop creating CDLC. I just don't feel motivated like when I started to creat,even I have many songs to do and update.Something is missing so it's very likely that I won't even bother even with this song

@@ShrillBear52 That's because you've deleted the FHP 1 AND 2 in that picture while you should just have deleted the 2 and not the 1!

Sorry but it's not quite clear what you said,could you explain it ??

  Also,I didn't had 3th FHP on the second 3th note on the E string (not in the older and not in the current one)

@@raynebc FHP were obviously manually edited as i was the one that brought up the issue about FHP change inside an arpeggio/handshape cause it made no sense to generate such situation.

 

In @@ShrillBear52 case i'm really not sure what issue are left... if you delete the FHP in the arpeggio marking just before 3:51 everything should be good...

What was that Handshape thing earlier??(I'm not sure that's why I'm asking)

The problems what is still appers: 

     1.)Chord sustains's highlited parts are not matching with the chord's sustain (only in DD)

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2dAm5utc-Vca0ZQdF9DaGc4Zmc

2.)the Part_Real_Guitar_22 (Rhythm) has chords that hasn't got highlited parts all the way (the pic. is not from the Real_Guitar_22 part, this was the Part_Real_Bass_22 what has a different issue now, but the idea is the same )

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2dAm5utc-VcX2Q5eXdjOElXenM

3.) Handshapes in Part_Real_Guitar(lead) and Part_Real_Guitar_Bonus(bouns lead) has issues with the handsahpes appering

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2dAm5utc-VcYVhGTlZ5X0lzTWc

4.)The phrases are not matchd with DD (just look any of these pictures at the Top of the part where it shows the DD then look at the events in the project) (and also it doesn't matter if I add phrases only at once when I define the sections also ("also add as RS phrase") I still don't know how to manage it correctly,because I always get these results.

5.) At Part_Real_Bass_22 (Bonus Rhythm) the A#minor chords are not behaving correctly at some points.What I mean with this is that the chord strumm pattern is not appering as a repeated one, altough they all have "High Dens." on them. (except the first one of course) e.g: At 1:06 the 10th chord is not appering as a repeated pattern and it has "HD" on it.

Turns out the FHP issue was not a problem with EOF, it doesn't put a change there when it auto-generates FHPs.

 

arpeggio toks 6 or 5 frets to show (from the first to the sixth or fivth)

I don't know what you mean by this.

 

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2dAm5utc-VcYkpFbGxSU191S1k

OK,I updated eof, resnaped all 5 parts, the phrases are still shit so does the problems that I mentoned before (even with 3.2 DDC)

 the only difference is with the  bass arpeggio. Idk why eof has problems with the FHP change, so I had to delet that fhp and the arpeggio toks 6 or 5 frets to show (from the first to the sixth or fivth)

There is a FHP defined at the middle of the arpeggio. This will break it.

 

Omg, thank you! Yes,I didn't noticed that, I'll look at everything twice for now to not get this issues :D 

 

What timestamp is that last screen capture at in the bass arrangement?

3:49 at the last Postchourus before the outro part.

 

I've posted a screenshot about the bass issue in the previous post.

   https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2dAm5utc-VcdXE1UDFySkFWM2c/view

Idk about the gridsnaps, I've resnapd all 5 parts and got those results, but I will check it again then.

  Also,I'm not sure if phrases are working correctly because I got the same result in the chart when I added DD to it.

What timestamp is that last screen capture at in the bass arrangement?

3:49 at the last Postchourus before the outro part.

Ok,I'm fucking pissd off, I changed the 3.1 DDC folder to 3.2 one, but the issues are still appering like the others that I mentioned and the only changing in the second one is that all those chords have "HD" on them but one is still appering without the repeated strum pattern,

  and also the other guitar part (REAL_GUITAR_22) has got that issue now(what I mentioned the second issue before).

  PART_REAL_GUITAR has issues at the handshapes in the verse sections .

  And also the Bass part(REAL_BASS) has got an issue with arpeggio mark:  https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2dAm5utc-VcdXE1UDFySkFWM2c

I created phrases for each arrangement like you said but from the 2-3 one became atleast 5!!!!

I've not updated eof yet but I doubt that all problems are came from that.

here is the project file that I used recently: https://www.dropbox.com/s/a189h76l6tqiwec/But%20I%27ll%20go%20on%20until%20the%20end.eof?dl=0

If I remember correctly, shift+p should add a new phrase on the selected measure

Thank you,I'm gonna try this.Sorry if I was rude in the prev. post, but does defining phrases gonna solve the second problem that I mentioned?

The link for DDC v3.2 is given in the following topic : DDC

 

About the phrases you should create in EOF :

- a phrase contains a pattern of notes that can be repeated many times in the arrangement

- a phrase is now the shortest part of the song that you can select in the Riff Repeater

- you can define long phrase length for easy parts of the song (8 measures for example) and short ones for the hard parts (2 measures for solos)

- you can choose precisely the starting point of a phrase in order to protect a sequence of chords or the sustain of a note or an handshape ...

My question was "how to define the phrases" in EOF correctly.

  What I'm asking is wich feature is what I need to use?

  eg:Shift+s is to add section to the arrangement parts and also define phrases.

@@ShrillBear52,

 

  Wich release of DDC are you using ?

 

  You should not have the first issue with DDC v3.2.

 

  I saw in your EOF project that you didn't define yourself the phrases (you have only created the sections and a phrase for each section).

  It is better to define the phrases you want in the final result rather than letting DDC arbitrarily choose which one to create ...

1)There is no freaking 3.2 DDC if I update the Toolkit and the newsest version on the website is 3.1 too.

2)How should I define phrases then? I used the method what went something like this:

Add section and phras,add the next one maybe 30 seconds later in the chart(with the same name of course)

   And that workd, unti the Reamastered update came out. 

  I've also dropd using the "push offset" feature becasue it just messd things up.