If you're mainly doing rock and blues, the PRS SE tremolo is fine. It's better than the regular Fender Strat tremolo. On my Strat that has the regular old-school Fender tremolo, I don't even bother to use it. Gets out of tune so much, that I just bolted it down. I got a Floyd Rose on my other Fender Strat, and while it's great for dive bombs and what not, I often don't play that guitar too much. Floyd Rose can be pain to restring, and especially if you want to change tunings. I got a budget G&L guitar (Leo Fender's second guitar company after he sold to Fender), and it's got a Strat sound but with a much better tremolo. I use that all the time for blues, Jimi Hendrix stuff, SRV and Rockabilly, that needs some whammy bar action. Jeff Beck stuff is good, too. I imagine that PRS SE tremolo would be fine for all of that stuff, too. There are some YouTube vids trying out the PRS SE tremolo, and they abuse it, and it held up pretty good when they compared it to the regular higher-end PRS with a more advanced tremolo. I was pretty impressed. I admit, Floyd Rose guitars can be fun, though, and I've got two guitars with them (the second one on my Ibanez), but that's just when I want to play metal, or some Van halen, etc. Most of the time my non-Floyd Rose tremolo guitars are fine, or my Gibson Les Paul (which of course has no tremolo). So much easier to change tunings, and restring. One other note: My two Strats, one with the Floyd Rose and the one with the regular tremolo, have a different tone. The Floyd Rose seems to lessen the sustain and doesn't quit sound as deep or full, as my non-Floyd Rose Strat. They are both Fender Strats, with the only difference being the tremolo (and the fact the Floyd Rose has a locking nut on it).