I have a new idea regarding reporting. Sometimes, we accidentally report the wrong chart—whether it's a different version, a different file, or even a completely different song by mistake.

It would be great if we could revoke or delete our own reports. That way, we could clear things up without having to ask the admin or the charter.

 

 

CustomsForgeBot deleted the CDLC: Shining On

02/15/2025 7:04 PM

Be my guest 🤷   Please don't reply to me, I'm not interested in discussing anything about this,

 

Please add an Api for search. It has been requested this years before and many of us would like to develop an own app for requests.

If it is possible, it would be nice, to have a kind of new and updated charts service to get info from the charts.

Thank you!

On 3/1/2025 at 8:10 AM, kozaka said:

Please add an Api for search. It has been requested this years before and many of us would like to develop an own app for requests.

If it is possible, it would be nice, to have a kind of new and updated charts service to get info from the charts.

Thank you!

Just know any API won't have a direct link to the chart, just the collection link that redirects to the download.

3 hours ago, Unleashed2k said:

Just know any API won't have a direct link to the chart, just the collection link that redirects to the download.

Yes, yes! Sure. Should point to the page to Ignition. As in RS Playlist.

Hi!

Can you maybe add a new feature to the reporting system discussion part, that we (reporter, charter plus the ones involved) get an notification in ignition + email if there is some new chat entry there?

After I report something, (luckily) in many cases I get some question back, but I do not get notified. So If I do not check the discussion, it could happen, that the report will be just closed, or the chart will be deleted.

Thank you!

18 hours ago, kozaka said:

Hi!

Can you maybe add a new feature to the reporting system discussion part, that we (reporter, charter plus the ones involved) get an notification in ignition + email if there is some new chat entry there?

After I report something, (luckily) in many cases I get some question back, but I do not get notified. So If I do not check the discussion, it could happen, that the report will be just closed, or the chart will be deleted.

Thank you!

Added, let me know if any weird issues occur.

On 4/1/2025 at 9:43 AM, Unleashed2k said:

Added, let me know if any weird issues occur.

Thank you!

I have a suggestion regarding the report system. It would be nice if only users with at least 10 uploaded CDLCs of their own could report, because that way they have an idea of how much work it takes to fix a particular bug.

4 hours ago, wrobi said:

I have a suggestion regarding the report system. It would be nice if only users with at least 10 uploaded CDLCs of their own could report, because that way they have an idea of how much work it takes to fix a particular bug.

 

Without any upload, we already know it’s a pain in the ass to create or fix a chart. To me, this feature makes no sense at all! How exactly would this new feature help our community?

On the other hand, one could argue that charts should be reviewed in advance by reliable musicians before being released for public use. That way, you wouldn’t need to fix them afterward because they’d already be fine. But that’s science fiction.

That’s why feedback currently happens through the “Report” tool, and the charter can discuss the problem either through the chat available on the report or directly on the record page. Nothing wrong with this. It could happen, that your chart gets a feedback. Also it may happen, that you do not have time to fix charts. Nothing is a must, anybody can wait. You can re upload later if you want a new version of the file.

 

Sorry, but it’s a -1 from me for this idea.

 

P.S.: I’ve already found some very minor issues in official DLCs too. Reporting those is impossible on Ignition 🙂

20 hours ago, kozaka said:

Without any upload, we already know it’s a pain in the ass to create or fix a chart. To me, this feature makes no sense at all! How exactly would this new feature help our community?

 

The problem is that the current reporting system does not support community development. I know of at least 3 people who have over 20 uploads but have stopped sharing publicly. They have since shared their work in smaller groups. That's because they simply don't have the time to fix the sometimes negligible errors flagged in the aggressive reports of critical players. There are many reports for several years of CDLC that would require almost the entire job to be done over again (which could take weeks). The song is otherwise playable, but the reporter doesn't like it because it's missing a few notes. The creator would rather spend his little free time on a new project, but if he doesn't log on to the site for 1 month, even more of his downloadable content will disappear from the site. It is not the creator who will be poorer, but the community who will not be able to download imperfect content (and his new projects) in the future.

Quote

P.S.: I’ve already found some very minor issues in official DLCs too. Reporting those is impossible on Ignition 🙂

Contact Ubusoft. I'm sure they will fix the problem. Especially since you paid for the content. 🤣

 

Quote

The song is otherwise playable

Debatable for some of the issues that get reported. But if you've been in the Customs Forge discord you'll know that there's changes to the report/feedback system coming.

Limiting who can report is absolutely ridiculous, especially if it's a minimum of 10 uploads. 10 quality uploads is a lot

Quote

but if he doesn't log on to the site for 1 month, even more of his downloadable content will disappear from the site

Already not true, but again if you're not in the discord then of course you won't know this kind of thing.

Quote

but the community who will not be able to download imperfect content (and his new projects) in the future

If it's something that doesn't meet the charting standards and the staff determines it needs to be hidden, then those "imperfect" charts don't deserve to be available

19 hours ago, BluesMcGroove said:

Already not true, but again if you're not in the discord then of course you won't know this kind of thing.

Content reported in January this year was deleted after 1 month. What do you think is not true in that sentence? Don't contradict a quote, but try to interpret it in context.

I don't care what the plan is that is being discussed on Discord. What I do care about is that for nearly ten years I've tried to bring together a small community of creators, tried to share knowledge and tasks to produce the highest quality content possible, and then some perfectionist players who have never made a CDLC come along criticize and report old content. As a result, many people have stopped making songs.

If you think this is the right direction, then good luck!

I chat with the people who are literally handling the reports and what is made available or not on the discord. You can claim whatever you want, but you are wrong. Plain and simple. I don't care what you've been trying to do or what you perceive as happening, you have the wrong opinion on this

3 hours ago, BluesMcGroove said:

I chat with the people who are literally handling the reports and what is made available or not on the discord. You can claim whatever you want, but you are wrong. Plain and simple. I don't care what you've been trying to do or what you perceive as happening, you have the wrong opinion on this

All right, you can scrabble like a rooster in the garbage heap, and I won't share my newly made songs. And everyone is happy except the average user.

It's almost as if you don't have proper info and are being overly proud and indignant. If something is removed due to lack in quality as determined by reviews of the staff of the site, during the report/review process then the only people at a loss are those that want badly made charts. Here's also a direct quote showing that nothing is actually deleted, anyway. But sure, I'm in the wrong lol.

Ok, two things kinda related to eachother. Why on earth does it forbid someone to make a request for a song on the wishlist if ANY part has already been charted? There's a wishlist listing for the lead part of "Wah-Wah" by George Harrison, and it's labeled Completed, but it's not completed, only the bass has been charted, not the lead. The maker of the CDLC said they aren't going to make an update to add lead or rhythm, so why is the request that is for lead marked as completed?

On 9/15/2025 at 12:17 PM, STRG_Ed said:

Ok, two things kinda related to eachother. Why on earth does it forbid someone to make a request for a song on the wishlist if ANY part has already been charted? There's a wishlist listing for the lead part of "Wah-Wah" by George Harrison, and it's labeled Completed, but it's not completed, only the bass has been charted, not the lead. The maker of the CDLC said they aren't going to make an update to add lead or rhythm, so why is the request that is for lead marked as completed?

I released a fix for you, should be set now. 

Hello, Mr.Unleashed2K. Is it possible we could get the tunings to show up on the CDLC page such as this picture, pretty please?